Films that have the appearance of being done in a single continuous take often raise two questions. The first: is this actually one shot? In films like Birdman or 1917 they appear to be one continuous shot - in reality they are multiple tales that, for the most part, are long set pieces seamlessly stitched together. Secondly: does this format benefit the narrative, or is this flaunting of technical ability?
In Boiling Point, I feel that this format serves the narrative in a way that thematically lends itself to this environment and creation of effective tension. The uninterrupted nature of filming makes the kitchen/restaurant environment feel alive and thriving, allowing performances like Graham’s to really have room to breathe. Having worked in kitchen environments before, I recognise the familiar problems that occur in a kitchen in addition to the growing tensions and panic towards the end of the night.
First and foremost, this is a gritty and gripping drama that isn’t interrupted by edits - allowing it to feel raw, yet benefitting from the polished digital cinematography.
Stephen Graham is gripping in this. He perfectly embodies the anxiety riddled Andy whilst keeping up appearances as head of the kitchen - swearing and taking his aggression out on others, though still being understanding and trying to be considerate of his staff.
The restaurant feels like a world of its own: every table is a story. From the party of social media influencers, to food critic on an unexpected visit, the many subplots are expertly woven into a massive payoff within the film’s final act.
Comentarios